Central Government: A Historical Analysis of Control
This book discusses the nature of Central Government, likening it to Babylonian type World Empires and highlighting the dangers of centralized power. It emphasizes how Central Government tends to prioritize its own survival over serving the people, using force to maintain control.
1. How does the book compare Central Government to Babylonian type World Empires?
2. What are some recognizable traits of Central Government mentioned in the book?
3. Why does the book argue that Marxism, as a form of Central Government, is bad?
How does the book compare Central Government to Babylonian type World Empires?
The book compares Central Government to Babylonian type World Empires by stating that Central Government is typified by Babylon. It mentions that Babylonian type World Empires, based on the concept of Central Government, are found throughout world history. The document suggests that the epitome of Central Government is often thought to be the Communist government of the Soviet Union. However, it also points out that evidence indicates that the Soviet Union’s government is not unlike other centralized governments in the world. The text implies that Marxism, as a form of Central Government, is considered typical and bad, similar to other centralized governments.
What are some recognizable traits of Central Government mentioned in the book?
Some recognizable traits of Central Government mentioned in the book include
1. Demands supreme jurisdiction.
2. Develops into a self-willed entity.
3. Has its own personality.
4. Must protect itself in order to survive.
5. Is never a servant, but rather a master.
6. Is perpetually at war with the public.
7. Uses police to enforce its will.
8. Utilizes debt, threat, brutality, and brainwashing against the people.
9. Implements tools such as a central bank, central taxing agency, central welfare system, centrally controlled police system, and government-controlled education system to keep the people subjugated.
Why does the book argue that Marxism, as a form of Central Government, is bad?
The book argues that Marxism, as a form of Central Government, is bad because it highlights the negative aspects of centralized power. It suggests that Central Government, including Marxist principles, tends to prioritize its own survival and control over serving the people. The document points out that Central Government is self-willed, self-protecting, and interested only in its own survival, portraying it as a master rather than a servant. Additionally, Central Government is depicted as using force, including police and military, to maintain its authority and suppress the public. The book implies that Marxism, like other forms of Central Government, operates in a manner that is detrimental to individual freedoms and societal well-being.
Summary
The book titled “Central Government” delves into the concept of Central Government and its implications on society, drawing parallels between centralized power structures and historical empires like Babylon. The document argues that Central Government, regardless of its name or form, tends to work against the best interests of the people it governs. It emphasizes that Central Government, whether administered through a Politburo, Congress, Parliament, or Monarch, inherently seeks to maintain its central power by limiting the freedom of the populace.
Drawing from historical and biblical references, the book likens Central Government to Babylonian type World Empires, highlighting how centralized authority has been a recurring theme throughout history. It points out that the Soviet Union’s Communist government is not unique in its centralized nature, suggesting that Marxism is just one manifestation of the broader concept of Central Government. The document portrays Central Government as a self-willed entity that prioritizes its own survival and control over serving the people, using tools like police enforcement, debt, threat, and brainwashing to keep the populace subdued.
The text outlines recognizable traits of Central Government, including its demand for supreme jurisdiction, development into a self-protecting entity with its own personality, and perpetual conflict with the public. It describes Central Government as a master rather than a servant, using force to maintain its unchallengeable power and suppress any potential threats to its authority. The document also highlights the use of centralized tools such as banks, taxing agencies, welfare systems, police forces, and education systems to control and subjugate the population.
Moreover, the book critiques Marxism as a form of Central Government, labeling it as bad due to its tendency to prioritize centralized control over individual freedoms and societal well-being. It argues that Marxism, like other centralized systems, operates in a manner that is detrimental to the interests of the people it governs. The document suggests that Central Government, whether under the guise of Communism, Democracy, or any other name, ultimately serves to consolidate power and limit the freedom of the populace.
In conclusion, the book presents a critical analysis of Central Government and its impact on society, drawing attention to the dangers of centralized power structures. By drawing parallels between historical empires, biblical references, and contemporary governance systems, the document underscores the need for vigilance in safeguarding individual liberties and preventing the encroachment of centralized authority on the rights of the people.